To assess skills in data management

FIND A SOLUTION AT American Essay Writers

rev. Su 2018Analysis #1 – 50 pointsPurpose: To assess skills in data management and statistical analysis using descriptive statistics (Objective 1).Due date: Sunday of Week 2Submit: BlackboardThis assignment must be submitted by Sunday, at the end of Week 2. Students must submit only two files forgrading: (1) SPSS Output File and (2) Word Document responding to the assignment questions. The goal of theassignment is to allow students to demonstrate their ability to run a statistical analysis using descriptivestatistics and interpret the results.Students should read all the Week 1 and Week 2 readings, watch all the videos, and practice with the appletsbefore completing the assignment. Students are encouraged to work with classmates and instructors whenpreparing the assignment. However, each student’s final output file and responses should be unique to thestudent and reflect his/her background, experience, expertise, and integrity. Please list the names of anyclassmates you collaborated with in the assignment submission comments in Blackboard.Each response should be clear and concise, using graduate-level writing, complete sentences, and respond to thequestion directly.Student work will be graded with a rubric and individual feedback from instructors will be posted. Students areexpected to use the feedback in preparing for the next assignment. They should correct errors, expand the scope,change data, improve file structures, etc. as suggested by instructors and incorporate those changes into futureassignments.This assignment uses the course data file that each student created at Immersion. Even though the data are froma real-life survey, this assignment requires you to approach the data as if it were data from your ownclinical scholarly project as described in the following scenario.Updated 4/26/2020Scenario for Analysis #1You, the intrepid DNP Student, are preparing to complete your clinical scholarly project as described in theCourse Dataset handout (Week 1). Your chair, Dr. Abby Normal, has requested some demographic informationabout your sample as well as descriptive statistics.For this analysis we will focus on the following variables of interest: race, female, age, married, education,poverty, alcohol, bmi_pre, and bmi_cat. Descriptions of the variables can be found in the Course Datasethandout.Step 1: Open the data file you created at Immersion. If corrections or changes were required by yourinstructor in the SBSS Lab feedback, you MUST make these changes in order to complete the Analysisassignments. If you are unsure you have made the appropriate changes, contact your instructorBEFORE beginning this assignment.Step 2 (SPSS Output): Run the following statistics in a new (blank) output file:• To confirm the work is your own, first display the data file information in SPSS by going to File,Display Data File Information, Working File before beginning your analysis.• Frequency table of interval/ratio variables with mean and standard deviation• Frequency tables of categorical (nominal and ordinal) variables.• Histogram of BMI_pre and education with a normal curve.• Save the SPSS output file to a place on your computer where you can find it again.o Name the file with your last name, the assignment number, the file type, and the dateo Using the format: Lastname1_Output_MMDDYYYYStep 3: Respond to the following questions. Your responses should follow APA formatting guidelines (e.g.,double-spaced, referenced, etc.), but please do not include a cover page.1. (Sample) In your own words, describe the variables of interest. In your description, make sure toinclude appropriately use measures of central tendency and corresponding measures of variation.Your descriptions should be bulleted, concise, substantive sentences describing your data beyondsimply reporting descriptive statistics. No more than one sentence should be used for each variable.2. (Table) Create a single APA table of descriptive statistics for the variables of interest to support yourdescriptions in question 1.3. (Analysis)a. In one to two sentences each, explain the variables of interest, what they measure, and how.b. Based on the scenario described in the Course Data handout, identify two empirical researchquestions that could be answered using any of the variables of interest as predictors with anoutcome of bmi_pre and bmi_cat. Use Mary’s Matrix to identify one appropriate statisticaltest to answer each research question.4. (Summary) Prepare a brief Summary for your CSP chair, Dr. Abby Normal, summarizing thefindings of your analysis and proposing a direction for further evaluation. Use statistical jargonsparingly and, when you do, explain what you mean. Focus on substantive interpretation supportedby APA format statistics.5. Save the file using the format: Lastname_Analysis1_MMDDYYYYStep 4: Submit your 2 files for grading.Updated 4/26/2020The Analysis #1 assignment will be graded with the following rubric:
Exemplary 4
Proficient 3
Developing 2
Emerging 1
SPSS Output(2.5)
Complete file that contains allelements of Step 2 of theinstructions and is logical given theassignment scenario
Complete file that contains allelements of Step 2 of theinstructions but does not match theassignment scenario well
File contains most elements of Step2 of the instructions
File does not comply with Step 2 ofthe instructions
Variables(1.25)
Response addresses all variables ofinterest. (AND) Each description issubstantive, clear, and concise.(AND) Each variable is describedwith an appropriate measure ofcentral tendency and appropriatemeasure of variation. (AND) Usesbullet points appropriately.
Response addresses all variables ofinterest. (AND/OR) All or mostdescriptions are substantive, butmay not clearly describe thevariable. (AND) Uses bullet pointsappropriately (OR) Response maybe missing one or two measures ofcentral tendency and/or variation.
Response does not address allvariables of interest. (OR)Descriptions are not substantive.(OR) Response is missing morethan two measures of centraltendency and/or variation. (OR)Does not use bullet points.
Response is incomplete and doesnot address all variables of interest.(AND) Does not includesubstantive responses. (AND) doesnot use bullet points. (OR) Doesnot include any statistical evidence.
Tables and Figures(2.5)
Tables have no errors in APAformat, contain appropriate layout(APA 5.08, 5.17), titles (APA5.12), headings (APA 5.13),content (APA 5.14), and notes(5.16) (AND) tables contain allappropriate information.
Tables have 1-2 errors in APAformat (OR) Tables do not containall appropriate information.
Tables have 3 or more errors inAPA format (AND/OR) Tables donot contain all appropriateinformation.
Tables not in APA format.
Analysis(2.5)
Analysis is 90-100% accurate.(AND) Uses bullet format.
Analysis is 80-89% accurate.(AND) Uses bullet format.
Analysis is 70-80% accurate. (OR)Analysis is not clear and concise.(OR) Does not use bullet format
Analysis is less than 70% accurate.(AND) Analysis is not clear andconcise. (AND/OR) Does not usebullet format.
Summary(2.5)
Summary is clear, concise, andsubstantive; uses statisticalevidence appropriately. (AND)Summary directly responds to theprompt.
Summary is substantive and usesstatistical evidence appropriately.(AND) Summary directly respondsto the prompt.
Summary is not clear, concise, orsubstantive (OR) does not usestatistical evidence appropriately.(OR) Summary attempts to respondto the prompt, but lacks clarity.
Summary does not respond to theprompt.
Expressionand Format(1.25)
Writing is graduate level andengaging. (AND) Writtenresponses communicate clearlyusing appropriate professional tone,grammar, spelling, andpunctuation.
Writing is graduate level andengaging. (AND) Writtenresponses may not communicateclearly, use appropriateprofessional tone, or there may be afew errors grammar, spelling, andpunctuation without detractingfrom readability.
Writing may not be graduate level.(OR) Written responses do notcommunicate clearly, useappropriate professional tone, orthere are several errors grammar,spelling, and punctuation,detracting from overall readability.
Poor writing quality, poorcommunication and unprofessionaltone. (OR) Extensive errors inspelling, grammar, or punctuationthat detract from the readability.

YOU MAY ALSO READ ...  Compare and contrast two philosophical theories, one from Ancient Greece and one from Ancient Rome,…
america-essay-wriers
Best Essay Writers

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER